Zenith EVM Explorer
K
DashboardBlocksTransactionsLinked TransactionsContractsTokensFaucetStatsAPI
DashboardBlocksTxsLinkedContracts
Canton Updates/1220e1...8e11
Previous UpdateNext Update

Canton Update

Canton Ledger Transaction

Canton
EVM
Canton
10 linked operations
0xa6b686e3...9834c985View lifecycle0x6164e823...64657e24View lifecycle0xfa1f03d3...f545a967View lifecycle0x21c40b20...a7a5a9eeView lifecycle0x218d4c2e...b950bc2dView lifecycle0x30c3e69e...071e8abaView lifecycle
Transaction Lifecycle(10 operations)
Full details →

Op 1: 0xa6b686e3...9834c985

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0xd32c...baa7 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 2: 0x6164e823...64657e24

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0x5d65...a112 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Resulting EVM Transaction
EVM Tx Hash
0xa6b686e3...9834c985
From
0xd025077a...55d0ceb2
To
0xd32c3a0c...e4b5baa7
Value
0.0100 $ZTH
Block
1222
Status
Success
Overview
Update ID
1220e19d6b...62c38e11
Offset
4675
Record Time
Jul 20, 2026, 15:21:38 UTC
Command ID
f6a2a73721c6...16150b1a
Synchronizer ID
da::1220d56d...ad0f65eb
Events (1)
created77e0a44b32dbf894220a7edd0513333948973d4eb6e95b148b1897d8526f526a:Zenith.Evm.Rules:BlockProposal
Contract:005fa0cbc3...a845cd15
Payload
{ "chainId": { "zeo": "zeo::1220789efd2002a6854a5c2b15b4b7fadafe10b4d1fb96b5216283b364d0421379e0", "version": "" }, "proposer": "Validator1::12207a8e828b3131791dde7f3405203e3913e23c096c30e25f8263489d05ce4c12bf", "transactions": [ "02f870830e4a25808201f48203e882520894b6557524f0f747001fb41047a9007efa87e659c1872386f26fc1000080c001a0b2208cfae85a321e4d824bc2d863caeafdf68789cdd4ba701c74daf6d89b6bcfa0120cbb159d9ec1de6f3997bf03fb04431306fbd6db1a1d49c1590dd9454db761", "02f870830e4a25018201f48203e882520894d32c3a0c0cba23d4718e1191fd4268f6e4b5baa7872386f26fc1000080c001a09dcbc748dda7cab10a97b4f881a7ec0731c14dd013821cc933478bf633df1545a00d9a8fe04dcdb6000998e8721408360259c75cdb4182956d9f37a117cbf60d87", "02f870830e4a25028201f48203e882520894ce02d8c8f9b2465714b1372f4f2697c21505ac8c872386f26fc1000080c001a0f866e4fbfba254eb5ca983a8b6b3727f2229d9513238975f251566b85f4dafeca074cd522803e161d4d47e7b0965dae7b2997902abffa38ddf42a4c67763ca76d6", "02f870830e4a25038201f48203e8825208947f757240e54ee48fa164bda46deb157e853bf62f872386f26fc1000080c001a079ed7684f1d8be91b6faa6cc4d0ed04c69299132d05640ba97cdd001e7ffb91ca069a898e562a930f7f75d9da032a8ccbb466cd1b9692a23af5bd61a951c87cb33", "02f870830e4a25048201f48203e8825208945d6539aab127cf80dabbd19244e3826b983ca112872386f26fc1000080c080a0e19ce3ba2f638cc2df1c771936521d2560d9cbdec7ae2b45552378eb2d07887ba022c8fcc0cb24c30db53ed4421f6c334fb5ce55d4b0cb74fa761cf70b9559c220", "02f870830e4a25058201f48203e88252089431a051c284f05312a32459a6c74155fe4ef0db64872386f26fc1000080c080a09873f269b1f218f006c305a848e6ddbb9317519658f3cdf0369d3c10f901c2a6a07ebece8cddb376631a8a678256d2924a778aecd2c7a54e87c2bcca5069e7e122", "02f870830e4a25068201f48203e8825208949f23e8cc49fb688083b26c035cf6598f22b89ed4872386f26fc1000080c080a04211788ea9f5c26c53a119e5500eaea062541e691e1d998f9e720e215eebdabaa07d7ec695e75effbc79732abac7292e4daee4fe5a7eedb36f56e79b7c2bf3fd3e", "02f870830e4a25078201f48203e88252089496d1961fc8736f12208c0242b572f4cb2560dbc8872386f26fc1000080c001a056d2049eda624d3fc48234d49bd0e1bb6c295300695d86180e312fc8b6d7501aa03211035eb0528e443a7093b5442e9d39d917e0e183fbbbf8daf7dc69b3bf2a51", "02f870830e4a25088201f48203e8825208947a5e46adffc838e2b37210af3177298e9466c63b872386f26fc1000080c001a08302c301beb9efc6ca67626011a95b7a8406361955f8480cf5158b5e413da468a0116a5082f39e75dea28ad6b2c4e448842d433cf0debb972d8f653db868a83074", "02f870830e4a25098201f48203e882520894b8de67e88c4be076150be034573d5437626b894d872386f26fc1000080c080a0c5470e092c9f6e7c02c11f9bc6081c4e5fca4e0c55cdbf681eafd7f3d3669dcaa056b6ad27bd38e2363d84f562ddf79fc8c7d8372d7b12b731ca36ae39e912ad04" ], "withdrawals": [], "observers": { "map": [ [ "Validator1::12207a8e828b3131791dde7f3405203e3913e23c096c30e25f8263489d05ce4c12bf", {} ] ] } }
0xf247b1cc...70d6c73b
View lifecycle
0x131882e7...4bfa04ebView lifecycle
0x7fa5c4a4...b9650722View lifecycle
0xe4053ecb...fa7ce608View lifecycle

Op 3: 0xfa1f03d3...f545a967

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0x96d1...dbc8 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 4: 0x21c40b20...a7a5a9ee

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0xce02...ac8c 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 5: 0x218d4c2e...b950bc2d

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0x31a0...db64 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 6: 0x30c3e69e...071e8aba

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0x7a5e...c63b 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 7: 0xf247b1cc...70d6c73b

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0xb655...59c1 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 8: 0x131882e7...4bfa04eb

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0x7f75...f62f 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 9: 0x7fa5c4a4...b9650722

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0x9f23...9ed4 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).

Op 10: 0xe4053ecb...fa7ce608

Block Published
EVM-initiated flowBatched · BlockProposal
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s

Eth Tx Submitted

0xd025...ceb2→0xb8de...894d 0.0100 $ZTH
94ms

Relayer Wraps Tx

Eth tx → Canton BlockProposal

47ms

Validator1 — Execute

participant1 · Initial REVM execution
328ms

Validator2 — Re-execute

participant2 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Validator3 — Re-execute

participant3 · REVM re-execution

328ms

Block Published

Block #1222
2.8s
0ms
1.0s
2.0s
3.0s
4.0s
4.5s
EVM
Canton
Consensus
Total
Complete
3.6s

Illustrative visualization. Canton commits Command → Consensus → Finalization atomically within a single transaction, so individual Canton step durations are estimates. Measured anchors from on-chain timestamps: Canton record time → synchronizer effective time, and effective time → EVM block timestamp (second granularity).